“My Love is Not Fragile”: An Examination of Relationship Dynamics in Disney’s Frozen Film Series
“My Love is Not Fragile”: An Examination of Relationship
Dynamics in Disney’s Frozen Film Series
Dayna Wilson - 300113188
Women and Feminism: Contemporary Issues
GSWS 1101 – 001
Dr. Sally Mennill
1375 Words
8 February 2021
When
the Walt Disney Company released their first animated classic princess movie, Snow
White and the Seven Dwarfs, a long tradition of introducing young children
to idealized romance was born. The next 75 years of princess classics produced
by Disney showed little variance from the established fairy tale romance trope:
prince rescues woman, marriage ensues. While later films attempted to afford
more agency to their central female characters, with The Little Mermaid
and Beauty and the Beast both including scenes where the female
character rescues the prince over the course of the story, both conclude with a
dramatic showdown between prince and villain. Once the brave prince has
defeated his foe, he is rewarded with the love of a grateful princess and they
live happily ever after. While these fairy tales may make for good stories, the
unrealistic and problematic nature of their portrayal of relationships can be
harmful to the impressionable children watching them. It seems, however, that
Disney may finally be listening to longstanding criticism of their featured
romances, as evidenced in the relationship portrayed between Princess Anna and
Kristoff Bjorgman in the blockbuster films Frozen and Frozen II. In
rejecting gender stereotypes while embracing strong female characterization, Frozen
II finally gives a new generation of children a healthy, realistic view of
a relationship worth aspiring to.
When
Princess Anna and Kristoff are initially introduced in the first film in the Frozen
franchise, Anna is recently engaged to the villainous Prince Hans, a man she
has known for mere hours prior to accepting his proposal. While this relationship
brevity has historically been a nonissue in Disney films, Anna’s lack of
familiarity with Hans becomes a major plot point in the film, with multiple
characters exclaiming “you can’t marry a man you’ve just met!” In the end, Anna
does not marry Hans, and is in fact rescued from a dire fate at his hands not
by Kristoff, but by her sister Elsa; and not before saving Elsa first. Through
this self-referential humour and rejection of the stereotypical “prince-rescues-princess,”
Disney successfully reframes the character of Anna from being defined by her
value as solely a romantic player, to instead being defined by her character as
a multi-dimensional woman and a sister. Together, Elsa and Anna defeat the evil
prince and work through shared trauma together. While Kristoff is positioned as
a romantic interest for Anna, said romance is peripheral to the central story
of sisterhood. Unlike Disney princess movies of the past, children are shown a
woman who, while still interested in romance, is not defined exclusively by
that interest.
At
the film’s conclusion, a critical moment occurs when Kristoff expresses that he
has developed romantic feelings for Anna. Rather than sweeping her passionately
into his arms, he models ideal relationship behaviour, and clearly asks for
consent: “I could kiss you. I could. I mean I’d like to. May I? May we?” Which
is then enthusiastically given. This is a crucial scene to witness, in a society
mired by rape culture and unhealthy depictions of romantic interactions. A 2018
study by the Canadian Women’s Foundation revealed that “only 28% of Canadians
fully [understand] what it means to give consent,” and that “more than half of
women 18-34 have felt pressured to consent” (Canadian Women’s Foundation). By acknowledging
the importance of consent in popular media aimed at young children, Disney is
contributing to the establishment of a healthy framework for what romance
should look like. Kristoff’s bashful request for consent is communicated as romantic
and desirable, and thus children form an expectation of consent as an integral
part of romance and desire.
When
we next see Anna and Kristoff in Frozen II, three years have passed, and
the two have settled into a comfortable relationship. Juxtaposed with the
instant engagement of Frozen and so many other preceding Disney films,
the portrayal of a couple not rushing into marriage and instead spending time developing
a partnership is not only refreshing, but positive messaging for children: A
2015 study on marriage duration demonstrated a strong positive correlation
between the length of time spent dating prior to marriage and the success of
the marriage itself (Francis-Tan and Mialon 1921). This diversion from the trope
of fairy tale romance immediately culminating in marriage serves to reinforce the
message of the first film, that marriage is not necessary for a woman to be an
interesting character.
When
the subject of marriage is inevitably approached in the film, it is not Anna,
but Kristoff who is revealed to be focusing on it. This reversal of traditional
gender roles continues throughout the story: while Anna is headstrong, focused
on her goals and secure in her relationship, Kristoff is shown to be feeling
insecure, concerned that the depth of his feelings is unrequited, and fixated
on his relationship to the degree that he sings a love ballad with the lyrics “Who
am I if I’m not your guy/ Where am I if we’re not together?” This
vulnerability, though traditionally associated with female characters, is never
used to debase or emasculate Kristoff. His appeal as a romantic lead is consistent
throughout this inner conflict he experiences, thus disrupting the narrative of
toxic masculinity that is so prevalent in media. When a film assigns
stereotypically feminine coded characteristics to a masculine character, then proceeds
to devalue said character, the message communicated is that those feminine coded
qualities are worthy of ridicule. When Frozen II screenwriter Jennifer
Lee made the choice to celebrate these qualities in a male character, the
message is instead that there is no shame in femininity or vulnerability, and
that men who express those qualities are not lesser. This message encourages and
normalizes healthy expression of emotions in children of all genders, which in
turn can lead to healthy communication in adult relationships.
While
Kristoff is busy singing romantic ballads in the forest with his reindeer
friend, Anna is not sitting idle, waiting for a proposal. While it is true that
traditionally, “Disney movies…teach little girls they are supposed to be
complacent and weak if they want to be successful” (Castillo, “Negative effects”),
this is not the case in Frozen II, with Anna embarking on a journey to
save the land from certain peril. The pivotal moment in the Anna-Kristoff
relationship comes when Anna reappears at the end of her adventure, being
chased by giant rock creatures. Entering on his faithful reindeer steed, the
quintessential Disney prince to the rescue, Kristoff come to Anna’s aid. Unlike
the many male characters before him, however, Kristoff does not take over from
Anna and defeat the antagonists on her behalf. Rather, with one phrase: “I’m
here, what do you need?” he acknowledges that this is her battle, that she is
capable of success on her own merits, and that he is available for support in
whatever form she would like it. In doing so, he allows Anna to be her own hero
and retain her agency over the situation. This demonstrates equality in the
partnership and refutes the social construct of men as protectors and women as inherently
weak and vulnerable. In witnessing this, children are exposed to an example of
female empowerment and likewise a man who is not threatened or repelled by said
empowerment. For once, girls and women are not encouraged to embrace weakness
to experience success or love.
It must be acknowledged that no media should be relied on exclusively to teach children about the social world and their place within it. Problematic aspects exist within most media, and no Disney film can replace the educational value of a conversation with a trusted adult. However, the impact of the media a child is exposed to cannot be underestimated, as “[c]hildren learn about the society they live in, and how to adapt to it, from the cultural products offered to them by that society” (Davis 8). When considering the depictions of relationships in films available to children today, the dynamic between Kristoff and Anna in the Frozen series is a relatively positive example. With strong themes of equality, male vulnerability, and female empowerment woven throughout the series, Frozen and Frozen II take important steps towards shaking off the sexist, patriarchal relationships of Disney films past and encouraging a more realistic look at what a healthy partnership should be.
Works
Cited
Beauty and the Beast. Directed
by Gary Trousdale and Kirk Wise, performances by Paige
O’Hara, Robby Benson, and Richard
White, Walt Disney Pictures, 1991.
Castillo, Paul. “The Negative Effects of Disney on Children.”
Daily Sundial, 4 December 2006.
https://sundial.csun.edu/9674/archive/thenegativeeffectsofdisneyonchildren/
Accessed 8 February 2021.
Francis‐Tan, Andrew, and Hugo M. Mialon. “‘A Diamond
is Forever’ and Other Fairy Tales:
The Relationship
Between Wedding Expenses and Marriage Duration.” Economic Inquiry, vol. 53,
no. 4, 10 March 2015, pp. 1919-1930. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12206
Frozen. Directed by Chris Buck
and Jennifer Lee, performances by Idina Menzel, Kristen Bell,
Jonathan Groff, and Josh Gad, Walt
Disney Studios Motion Pictures, 2013.
Frozen II. Directed by Chris Buck and
Jennifer Lee, performances by Idina Menzel, Kristen Bell,
Jonathan Groff, and Josh Gad, Walt
Disney Studios Motion Pictures, 2019.
The Little Mermaid. Directed by Ron Clements
and John Musker, performances by Jodi Benson,
Christopher Daniel Barnes, and Pat
Carroll, Walt Disney Pictures, 1989.
Messenger Davies, Máire. Children, Media and
Culture. ProQuest Ebook Central. McGraw-Hill
Education, 2010.
Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. Directed
by David Hand et al., performances by Adriana
Caselotti, Lucille La Verne, and
Harry Stockwell, Walt Disney Productions, 1937.
“Survey Finds Drop in Canadians’ Understanding of
Consent.” Canadian Women’s Foundation,
16 May 2018. https://canadianwomen.org/survey-finds-drop-in-canadians-understanding-of-consent/
Accessed 8 February 2021.
Comments
Post a Comment